In Well's Barnett's "Lynch Laws of America" she
uses various appeals of pathos and logos as a way to give herself authority in
talking to not just black people about lynching but white people as well. In
her opening statement on page 1 she says, "Our country's national crime is
lynching." We noticed in discussion her use of language in this sentence
is a way to lump all her readers into one category. As she continues to write
using factual and graphic details she doesn't seem to be using her femininity
or even her skin color as a way to prove her claims.
I believe this is done because she
doesn’t wish to be just seen as black or white or even a woman, but she wants
to be seen as an American. The presentation group for Agency stated that, “Agency
is a social structure representative of individuals who are divided into
different categories based on externals.” Wells-Barnett uses information like
being sued by other countries for wrongful lynching deaths as a way to create
an external force that gives the reader a sense of American agency. This
American agency allows Wells-Barnett to reach not only a larger audience than
just black readers who already know about lynching, but also a more
sophisticated one in the case of white males who might have more power in
changing these “unwritten laws”.
No comments:
Post a Comment